<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Who Needs Facts?</title>
	<link>http://whoneedsfacts.com</link>
	<description>Keep asking questions after you already know all the answers.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Bush joins republicans in crowning Hillary</title>
		<link>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/09/bush-joins-republicans-in-crowning-hillary/</link>
		<comments>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/09/bush-joins-republicans-in-crowning-hillary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 00:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Who Ever</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Other Stuff</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/09/bush-joins-republicans-in-crowning-hillary/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be careful what you wish for&#8230; I am reminded of the tale of the rabbit who when captured begged please whatever you do please don&#8217;t throw me in that briar patch&#8230; I feel sure the proclaimations that Hillary has the democratic domination in the bag must be a head game. Otherwise why would the president [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Be careful what you wish for&#8230;</strong> I am reminded of the tale of the rabbit who when captured begged please whatever you do please don&#8217;t throw me in that briar patch&#8230; I feel sure the proclaimations that Hillary has the democratic domination in the bag must be a head game. Otherwise why would the president even join in the chorus. I think rove stated it and all his loyal subjects feel in line. Desperation has set in for the republicans but the only thing that is certain in my opinion is they will take another beating at the polls. It is way too early to call either parties nominee. My prediction at this point is one of the dems besides Hillary or Obama will get the nomination. Who knows it could turn out that a second tier candidate wins the nomination on both sides. Although I feel this is more likely for the democrats than for the republicans. I don&#8217;t have a personal pick yet but will decide soon enough. I just think it is significant that republicans are making predictions already. It shows more than anything else they are so anxious to focus on a single candidate. I think it indicates a strong field and my guess would be that all of republican candidates see higher numbers against Hillary. I think they see her as their last best hope for holding on to power. <strong>Be careful what you wish for&#8230;</strong></p>
<p align="center">Official Site of <a href="http://www.hillaryclinton.com/?splash=1">Hillary Clinton for President</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/09/bush-joins-republicans-in-crowning-hillary/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whatever</title>
		<link>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/07/whatever/</link>
		<comments>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/07/whatever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 18:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Who Ever</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Other Stuff</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/07/whatever/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haven&#8217;t posted anything in a while so I thought I would just say hello.
Official Website of Barack Obama 2008 Presidential Campaign
and don&#8217;t forget the girl.. YouTube - &#8220;I Got a Crush&#8230;On Obama&#8221; By Obama Girl

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t posted anything in a while so I thought I would just say hello.</p>
<p>Official Website of <a href="http://www.barackobama.com/">Barack Obama 2008 Presidential Campaign</a></p>
<p>and don&#8217;t forget the girl.. <strong>YouTube</strong> - &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKsoXHYICqU">I Got a Crush&#8230;On Obama</a>&#8221; <strong>By Obama Girl</strong>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/07/whatever/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtual Library</title>
		<link>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/03/virtual-library/</link>
		<comments>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/03/virtual-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Who Ever</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Other Stuff</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/03/virtual-library/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WWW Virtual Library

Agriculture
The Arts
Business and Economics
Communications and Media
Computing and Computer Science
Education
Engineering
Humanities and Humanistic Studies
Information and Libraries
International Affairs
Law
Natural Sciences and Mathematics
Recreation
Regional Studies
Social and Behavioural Sciences
Society

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="The WWW Virtual Library" href="http://vlib.org/" target="_blank">The WWW Virtual Library</a></p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Agriculture">Agriculture</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Art">The Arts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/BusinessEconomics">Business and Economics</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Communication">Communications and Media</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Computing">Computing and Computer Science</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Education">Education</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Engineering">Engineering</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Humanities">Humanities and Humanistic Studies</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/InformationManagement">Information and Libraries</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/InternationalAffairs">International Affairs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Law">Law</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Science">Natural Sciences and Mathematics</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Recreation">Recreation</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Regional">Regional Studies</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/SocialSciences">Social and Behavioural Sciences</a></li>
<li><a href="http://vlib.org/Society">Society</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/03/virtual-library/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Jesus a Mortal Man?</title>
		<link>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/02/was-jesus-a-mortal-man/</link>
		<comments>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/02/was-jesus-a-mortal-man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Who Ever</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Other Stuff</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/02/was-jesus-a-mortal-man/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Discovery Channel documentary is sure to ruffle some feathers within the Christian faith. The film has a seemingly respectable group of scholars &#038; scientists behind it which gives it a certain degree of credibility. At the very least it cannot be ignored no matter whether you accept the findings or not. The primary claim is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a title="Discovery Channel" href="http://dsc.discovery.com/" target="_blank">Discovery Channel</a> documentary is sure to ruffle some feathers within the Christian faith. The film has a seemingly respectable group of scholars &#038; scientists behind it which gives it a certain degree of credibility. At the very least it cannot be ignored no matter whether you accept the findings or not. The primary claim is this: &#8220;<a title="Jesus Family Tomb Found" href="http://religion.aztrx.net/7/jesus-family-tomb-found/" target="_blank">Jesus Family Tomb Found</a>&#8221; which cuts at the very heart of Christian belief.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/02/was-jesus-a-mortal-man/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Windows Upgrade</title>
		<link>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/01/new-windows-upgrade/</link>
		<comments>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/01/new-windows-upgrade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 18:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Who Ever</dc:creator>
		
	<category>Other Stuff</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/01/new-windows-upgrade/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Be careful when upgrading or this just might happen to you!
Dear Tech Support:
Last year I upgraded from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0. I soon noticed that the new program began unexpected child processing that took up a lot of space and valuable resources.
In addition, Wife 1.0 installed itself into all other programs and now monitors [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful when upgrading or this just might happen to you!</p>
<p>Dear Tech Support:</p>
<p>Last year I upgraded from Girlfriend 7.0 to Wife 1.0. I soon noticed that the new program began unexpected child processing that took up a lot of space and valuable resources.</p>
<p>In addition, Wife 1.0 installed itself into all other programs and now monitors all other system activity. Applications such as Poker Night 10.3, Football 5.0 , Hunting and Fishing 7.5 , and Golfing 3.6.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t seem to keep Wife 1.0 in the background while attempting to run my favorite applications. I&#8217;m thinking about going back to Girlfriend 7.0 , but the uninstall doesn&#8217;t work on Wife 1.0 . Please help!</p>
<p>Thanks, <br />
Troubled User</p>
<hr />REPLY:<br />
Dear Troubled User: </p>
<p>This is a very common problem that men complain about.</p>
<p>Many people upgrade from <em>Girlfriend 7.0</em> to <em>Wife 1.0</em>, thinking that it is just a Utilities and Entertainment program. <em>Wife 1.0</em> is an OPERATING SYSTEM and is designed by its Creator to run EVERYTHING!!! It is also impossible to delete Wife 1.0 and to return to <em>Girlfriend 7.0</em> . It is impossible to uninstall, or purge the program files from the system once installed.</p>
<p>You cannot go back to <em>Girlfriend 7.0</em> because <em>Wife 1.0</em> is designed to not allow this. Look in your <em>Wife 1.0</em> manual under Warnings-Alimony/Child Support . I recommend that you keep Wife 1.0 and work on improving the situation. I suggest installing the background application &#8220;Yes Dear&#8221; to alleviate software augmentation.</p>
<p>The best course of action is to enter the command C:\APOLOGIZE! because ultimately you will have to give the APOLOGIZE command before the system will return to normal anyway.</p>
<p>Wife 1.0 is a great program, but it tends to be very high maintenance . Wife 1.0 comes with several support programs, such as <em>Clean &#038; Sweep 3.0</em> , <em>Cook my Dinner 1.5</em> and <em>Pay the Bills 4.2</em> .</p>
<p>However, be very careful how you use these programs. Improper use will cause the system to launch the program <em>Nag Nag 9.5</em> . Once this happens, the only way to improve the performance of <em>Wife 1.0</em> is to purchase additional software. I recommend <em>Flowers 2.1</em> and <em>Diamonds 5.0</em> !</p>
<p><strong>WARNING!!! DO NOT</strong>, under any circumstances, install <em>Secretary With Short Skirt 3.3</em> . This application is not supported by <em>Wife 1.0</em> and will cause irreversible damage to the operating system!</p>
<p>Best of luck,</p>
<p>Tech Support</p>
<p><em>PS installing a fresh copy of Girlfriend 8.5 is a possible but risky option. If you choose this option be sure to place it in a hidden folder on your hard drive.</em></p>
<hr />I am not sure who the orginal author of this is or I would give credit. I just couldn&#8217;t resist posting it here. Especially since I have not posted anything for a while. Been busy busy busy. 
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRSS>http://whoneedsfacts.com/2007/01/new-windows-upgrade/feed/</wfw:commentRSS>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
